The concert supported the Benefit Artists Welfare Fund and was attended by an audience open to contemporary art and the avant-garde. Yet the audience did not share Cage’s willingness to engage a moment, a short passage of time, with a minimum of intention. As Cage explained, "The essential meaning of silence is the giving up of intention." Cage operated within the convention of a concert setting, but opened the moment to chance. Of his experiments with the I Ching he said,
If you use, as I do, chance operations, you don’t have control except in the way of designing the questions which you ask. That you can control. I mean you can decide to ask certain questions and not others. But if you use chance operations, you have no control over the answers, except the limits within which they operate.
In explaining the audience’s discomfort with 4’33”, Peter Gutman alludes to a basic human need for “the familiarity of repetition.” Cage inverted the familiar setting of a classical concert by introducing a seeming silence where the audience expected orchestrated sound. In fact, Cage did not consider 4’33” silent. Rather, his composition argued against the very existence of silence. In 1951 he had entered an anechoic chamber to experience the complete absence of noise only to discover the resonant sound of his own nervous and circulatory systems: “Try as we may to make silence, we cannot.”
1 comment:
Yes, wrote about Cage in my MFA thesis. Eric's show, Flight 18 relates to Cage's 4'33 piece. Although there is no silence it does rely on response from audience. On a personal note I am trying to say less these days. This is not easy as bitching can feel good (at least while you are doing it).
Post a Comment